http://opc.org/qa.html The purpose of the OPC website's "Questions and Answers" is to respond to biblical and theological questions. Matters of church discipline, disputes, or debates go beyond the scope of our work. We recommend that you present your concerns in these areas to the appropriate judicatory. In most cases this will be to a local pastor, elder, or session. We do not want the website to replace personal involvement in, or commitment to. the local, visible church. en-us Fri, 03 Feb 2012 00:04:01 EST Copyright 2007-2012 Orthodox Presbyterian Church Orthodox Presbyterian Church http://opc.org/qa.html?question_id=470 If Christianity is the only true "religion" then all other religions are false faiths. Understanding that, ultimately, Satan and his demons energize, inspire, and are behind all false religions (Satan seeking worship for himself and not to the only true and living God). Is Judaism a false faith exercising false worship of a false god, and, bottom line, a worship of "demons"? I don't mean any ill or to be blunt; I'm just curious and think this would be the logical and reasonable deduction. Some people think that Judaism is truly worshipping the true Jehovah but they just don't know any better as to recognize Jesus as the promised Messiah. Sun, 29 Jan 2012 00:00:00 EST http://opc.org/qa.html?question_id=470 http://opc.org/qa.html?question_id=469 I'd like clarity on the issues of jewelry and artificial hair. Is it a sin to wear them? Please give Bible references. Thanks. Sun, 22 Jan 2012 00:00:00 EST http://opc.org/qa.html?question_id=469 http://opc.org/qa.html?question_id=468 Why did J.I. Packer sign the "Evangelicals and Catholics Together" document? What does that mean for his earlier writings, e.g., Knowing God? Sun, 15 Jan 2012 00:00:00 EST http://opc.org/qa.html?question_id=468 http://opc.org/qa.html?question_id=467 I've seen the case for the Reformed view of the proper mode of baptism and find the article Is Immersion Necessary for Baptism? very helpful. I wonder about the validity of sprinkling if the water does not touch the skin/scalp of the person being baptized because of the thickness of his/her hair. A Roman Catholic website has this to say about such a situation. It is to be noted that it is not sufficient for the water to merely touch the candidate; it must also flow, otherwise there would seem to be no real ablution. At best, such a baptism would be considered doubtful. If the water touches only the hair, the sacrament has probably been validly conferred, though in practice the safer course must be followed. If only the clothes of the person have received the aspersion, the baptism is undoubtedly void. (http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/02258b.htm) Do Roman Catholics view the administration of baptism in this way because they believe in baptismal regeneration? What is the Reformed response? Sun, 08 Jan 2012 00:00:00 EST http://opc.org/qa.html?question_id=467